Blog

  • The Wrong Bus Transfer – Part 1

    The Wrong Bus Transfer – Part 1

    Why was a bus transfer for the number 23 Lakewood Line found on Oswald if he’d been on a number 30 Marsalis Line bus?

    How Did Oswald Get the Wrong Bus Transfer? – Part 1

    Will Fritz’s Freudian slip: Why was a bus transfer for the number 23 Lakewood Line found on Oswald if he’d been on a number 30 Marsalis Line bus?

     

    By the Warren Commission’s account, Lee Oswald got on and then off a Marsalis southbound bus – 12:39-12:43 pm – on Elm Street, Downtown Dallas, just before the intersection with Lamar. However, Deputy Sheriff Roger Craig said that approximately 10 minutes after Kennedy was shot (making it 12:40 pm), he saw Oswald running down the slope near the Depository and then getting into a station wagon.

    Craig’s affidavit of November 22, 1963, said the man was identical to Oswald, whom he saw again later at 5:18 pm in the office of the head of the Dallas Police Homicide Bureau, Captain Will Fritz, 3 hours after Oswald arrived at City Hall after his arrest at the Texas Theatre.

    Craig later testified to the Warren Commission at 2:35 pm, April 1, 1964, before Counsel Belin.

    Mr. BELIN – All right. Then, what did Captain Fritz say, what did you say, and what did the suspect say?

    Mr. CRAIG – Captain Fritz then asked him about the—uh—he said, “What about this station wagon?”

    And the suspect interrupted him and said, “That station wagon belongs to Mrs. Paine”—I believe that is what he said. “Don’t try to tie her into this. She had nothing to do with it.”

    And–uh–Captain Fritz then told him, as close as I can remember, that, “All we’re trying to do is find out what happened, and this man saw you leave from the scene.”

    And the suspect again interrupted Captain Fritz and said, “I told you people I did.” And–uh–yeah–then, he said–then he continued and he said, “Everybody will know who I am now.”

    By that account, Craig and Oswald himself not only ruled out Oswald being on the Marsalis bus but also linked Ruth Paine – the owner of the house in Irving where Marina Oswald lived and Oswald stayed at weekends – to that car.

    But Captain Fritz, in testifying to the Warren Commission (Vol IV, p. 202) on April 22, 1964, to Counsel Ball, said this about Craig.

    FRITZ. One deputy sheriff who started to talk to me but he was telling me some things that I knew wouldn’t help us and I didn’t talk to him but someone else took an affidavit from him. His story that he was telling didn’t fit with what we knew to be true.’

    Given that all of this relates to the afternoon of November 22, 1963, how could Fritz at that time have possibly known what Craig was telling him was not going to help him? Especially as Fritz claims Craig had only started to tell him something, and Fritz’s account of Oswald’s own story–as I show later–was fluid, inconsistent and far from truthful.

    This article explores that question. Was Fritz emitting a Freudian slip?

    Nothing appearing as evidence on November 22, 1963, provides a basis for Fritz to have dismissed what Roger Craig always maintained. What does appear in the record is a making up and suppression of evidence instead.

    I. The Other Witnesses: Cooper and Robinson

    Roy Cooper worked for a military aircraft maker, Ling-Temco-Vought (now part of Northrop Grumman). He told the FBI on November 23, 1963, that he saw a Nash Rambler pick up a man running from the direction of the Depository. Cooper said he was driving behind his boss, Marvin Robinson, who nearly collided with it. The vehicle headed under the overpass in the direction of Oak Cliff.

    Cooper told the FBI to contact Robinson at home or at the Naval Air Station at Grand Prairie. Cooper was following Robinson to drop a car off at Robinson’s house, 5120 S Marsalis, Dallas. Marvin Robinson was traced and confirmed that in an interview with the FBI the same day, November 23, 1963.

    The Commission file for Roger Craig shows that Robinson was scheduled by Commission staff to testify on April 1, 1964, at 2:30 pm to Counsel Ball, simultaneously with Deputy Sheriff Roger Craig. But his testimony does not appear in any records. Attendance was tightly managed. If a witness did not acknowledge the request to appear, by phone call, the Secret Service made contact to ensure it happened.

    Robinson had been very easily traced on November 23 via Cooper as they worked at the same air base. Robinson carried on working on aircraft even in retirement near Dallas. He was very much of fixed abode and workplace and appears at the stated address in the City Directory. There is no explanation as to why Robinson did not testify. Or if he did testify, why is that testimony missing from the records? But whatever the case, Josiah Thompson used his FBI report to telling effect in his early book, Six Seconds in Dallas. If one reads the effect that Robinson’s testimony has combined with Craig’s, which Thompson does, then one may be able to ponder the reason for his absence. (Thompson, pp. 242-43)

    The Warren Commission’s report dismissed Craig’s story on the basis that Oswald was on the bus at that same time. But the timeline of Fritz’s denial of Craig’s relevance is also important. Fritz, in testifying to the Warren Commission on April 22, 1964 to Counsel Ball, said this:

    Mr. FRITZ. He [Oswald] told me that was the transfer the busdriver had given him when he caught the bus to go home. But he had told me if you will remember in our previous conversation that he rode the bus or on North Beckley and had walked home but in the meantime, someone had told me about him riding a cab.

    And,

    So, when I asked him [Oswald] about a cab ride if he had ridden in a cab he said yes, he had, he told me wrong about the bus, he had rode a cab. He said the reason he changed, that he rode the bus for a short distance, and the crowd was so heavy and traffic was so bad that he got out and caught a cab, and I asked him some other questions about the cab and I asked him what happened there when he caught the cab and he said there was a lady trying to catch a cab and he told the busdriver, the busdriver told him to tell the lady to catch the cab behind him and he said he rode that cab over near his home, he rode home in a cab.

    Fritz was misleadingly inaccurate regarding the “someone” in the “meantime”. By cab driver William Whaley’s testimony of March 12, 1964, in Washington, and his affidavit of November 23, the cab lead, and his description of the lady, etc., didn’t appear until the next day, November 23. Whaley testified thus.

    Mr. BALL. Later that day did you-were you called down to the police department?

    Mr. WHALEY. No, sir.

    Mr. BALL. Were you the next day?

    Mr. WHALEY. No, sir; they came and got me, sir, the next day after I told my superior when I saw in the paper his picture, I told my superiors that that had been my passenger that day at noon. They called up the police and they came up and got me.

    Mr. BALL. When you saw in the newspaper the picture of the man?

    Mr. WHALEY. Yes, sir.

    Mr. BALL. You went to your superior and told him you thought he was your passenger?

    Mr. WHALEY. Yes, sir.

    So up to the point when Craig was telling Fritz something, there was nothing to provide any basis to dismiss what Craig was telling him. Indeed, Fritz’s account of Oswald changing his story of how he got to Beckley cannot be true, given that there was no cab revelation that day.

    Fritz’s peremptory dismissal of Roger Craig’s story seems to be based on Fritz making up a counter-story that is full of holes and contradictions.

    By April 1, 1964, the story that Oswald was identified on the bus was in tatters.

    II. The Misidentification of Oswald by the Bus Driver

    Without a lead to a cab on November 22, all there was to go on was the bus transfer, which was allegedly found on Oswald at around 4:05 pm on November 22, by Detective Simms, just as Oswald was taken downstairs for his first witness lineup (see later).

    The transfer lead involved driver Cecil McWatters and his Line 30 Marsalis bus. However, and counter to what Fritz had said, Oswald originally told him that the bus line wasn’t a route to Oswald’s 1026 N Beckley rooming house. The Marsalis line deviated ¾ mile before that Beckley destination, at the south end of the Houston Street Viaduct.

    This is then from the testimony of Detective Dhority taken on April 6, 1964. The lineup referred to is Oswald’s second.

    Mr. BALL. What was the first thing that you did that day with respect to the investigation of the President’s assassination?

    Mr. DHORITY. Around 6 p.m., Detective Brown and myself went out and got Mr. McWatters from the bus in front of the city hall there and brought him into the lineup and took an affidavit off of him.

    Ball then read from that affidavit taken on November 22.

    Mr. BALL. What did McWatters say to you?

    Mr. DHORITY. He identified him as the man that rode on the bus and said he wasn’t for sure exactly where he picked him up, but he said he believed that he got off shortly after he got on the bus, but after he identified him he went upstairs and looked at a transfer that Detective Sims had took out of Oswald’s pocket, and he positively identified the transfer as his transfer.

    Mr. BALL. You took McWatters’ affidavit after that, didn’t you?

    Mr. DHORITY. Yes, sir.

    Mr. BALL. Right after he had made an identification?

    Mr. DHORITY. Yes, sir.

    Mr. BALL. Of Oswald?

    Mr. DHORITY. Yes, sir.

    Mr. BALL. At that time, and I’ll show you a copy of an affidavit by McWatters, and will you take a look at that, please?

    Mr. DHORITY. [Examined instrument referred to.]

    Mr. BALL. Mr. Dhority, after the showup, did you take the affidavit from Mr. McWatters?

    Mr. DHORITY. Yes, I did.

    Mr. BALL. Now, in the affidavit here he says he picked up a man on the lower end of town on Elm and Houston and went out on Marsalis and picked up a woman, and then he mentions that as he went out, “This man was grinning and never did say anything. The woman said that it was not a grinning matter. I don’t remember where I let this man off. This man looks like the No. 2 man I saw in a lineup tonight.”.Now, you read that, didn’t you?

    Mr. DHORITY. Yes.

    But as Ball noted, the positive identification Dhority cited did not accord with what McWatters’ affidavit actually said. Nor did it accord with McWatters’ FBI statement the next day, November 23 (page 6). That FBI statement said.

    MCWATTERS stated that he went to the Dallas Police Department on November 22, 1963, and from a lineup picked a man whom he said is the only one in the lineup who resembles the man who had ridden on his bus on November 22, 1963. He stated that this man was LEE OSWALD, but emphasized that he cannot specifically identify him as being on his bus or as being the person who made the remark to the effect that the President was shot in the temple.

    He stated he “cannot be sure where this man got off the bus, but he believes it was south of Saner Avenue in Oak Cliff”.

    Saner Avenue was near the south end of the Marsalis line, over 5 miles from Elm Street. The bus was scheduled for arrival at the Saner end of the line at 12:58 pm (CE378).

    Dhority’s assertions are also discredited by what McWatters testified 25 days earlier to the Commission in Washington on March 12, 1964 (Vol II page 263), immediately after Whaley.

    McWatters withdrew any identification of Oswald entirely and said the person he’d seen on the bus was actually Roy Milton Jones, a teenager.

    Mr. BALL – Now you realize you were mistaken in your identification that night?

    Mr. McWATTERS – That is right.

    Mr. BALL – As I understand it, neither then nor now are you able to identify or say that you have again seen the man that got off your bus to whom you gave a transfer?

    Mr. McWATTERS – No, sir; I couldn’t. I could not identify him.

    Milton Jones was traced at the Commission’s request. On March 30, 1964, he told the FBI (CE2641) that the bus was held up by police boarding it on Elm Street for almost an hour and said he got off at Marsalis@Brownley at 1:45 pm. That is one block south of Saner Avenue and hence chimes with McWatters’ account. But given that is where the bus should have been circa 12:56 pm, the bus was 50 minutes late.

    All of McWatters’ police and FBI statements were silent about the delay and the police boarding causing it. But Milton Jones’ account can be corroborated on time. The Dallas Morning News of 28 November 1963, reported.

    “The cashier of the Texas Theater immediately called the police – who had just sped en masse to a false alarm at the Dallas Library branch on Jefferson, further to the east. The police sirens wailed again. Oddly enough it was at the library that McWatters, the bus driver who, unknowingly, had Oswald as a passenger earlier, had his second brush with fate. His bus pulled up at the intersection as a swarm of 10 or 15 police cars zeroed in on the library, *I couldn’t imagine what was going on” said McWatters. “Little did I know!“.

    That false sighting of Oswald at the library at Marsalis and Jefferson appears on the patrol radio around 1:30 pm. The bus should have been there at 12:50 pm (CE378), thus it was at least 40 minutes late. That would make a late arrival at Saner of 1:40 pm. Thus corroborating what Milton Jones told the FBI.

    Milton Jones told the FBI that he and McWatters talked about those events on Monday, November 25, when Milton Jones was back on the bus again.

    Milton Jones also revealed to the FBI that McWatters told him the DPD had questioned him until 1:00 am the next day.

    Seven hours is a long time to hold a witness who hadn’t actually made a positive identification of Oswald. But it would be consistent with trying to turn things into “evidence”.

    Nevertheless, Oswald was charged on November 22, 1964, for the murder of Officer JD Tippit by relying on McWatters and the bus story as the explanation for how Oswald could have gotten to 1026 N Beckley to then get to the Tippit murder scene.

    Given the discrepancies on the person, the time and the place, then the story of the bus transfer must also be in doubt.

    Rather than incriminating Oswald, the transfer actually incriminates the police. The transfer supposedly found on Oswald was not for Line 30 Marsalis, but Line 23 Lakewood.

    III. THE BUS ROUTE, TIMES AND THE TRANSFER

    The Line 30 Marsalis route McWatters was driving was also known as Marsalis-Munger. It was confirmed by the foreman at the bus company, Mr. JE Cook (McWatters file page 8). Munger is a district north of Downtown, as well as an intersection towards Lakewood on Gaston Avenue. He said the sign would have been set for “30 • Marsalis – Union Station” and set the signs for that for FBI photographs for the Commission.

    McWatters, in testifying to the Commission, said that he was scheduled for that run from 11:52 am until 2:27 pm, when he then switched lines.

    The bus schedule (CE378) shows that Marsalis Line 30, 1213, started its crosstown schedule at 12:11 pm from Ellsworth/Anita (Lakewood), Gaston Avenue (a long road running south to Downtown), Elm Street (Downtown), Houston Street (Dealey Plaza), North and South Marsalis Avenue (Oak Cliff), with a scheduled end at Ann Arbor (Saner district), at 12:58 pm.

    The turnaround schedule (heading to Munger) was to be back at Lakewood at 2:11 pm, then ending at Gaston@Paulus 2:20 pm, which leads to the bus transfer ticket.

    A bus transfer is a form of ticket issued when a passenger breaks a journey, enabling a follow-up journey on another connecting bus line, without paying another full fare. According to McWatters’ Warren Commission testimony, a passenger had to give a reason for getting a transfer.

    The Commission photograph of the transfer 004459 supposedly found on Oswald, which appears as CE383-A, is blurry to read, but the one on the left is a color one via John Armstrong.

    Drivers were given books, each containing 50 transfers preprinted for the date. The first transfer was torn off and left at the depot as the receipt for taking that book. The photo on the right is transfer 004451. The 1963 Dallas transfer states it was valid “within 15 minutes from the time indicated on the first point of intersection or transfer point for connecting lines”.

    The transfer had punches for relevant boxes, except for the time, which was cut. The same ticket company, Globe Ticket Co, still exists and still sells cutters and punchers. Comparing these two transfers shows how CE381-A was cut back to the first possible time, 1:00 and punched PM. Whereas, a horizontal cut at the foot would be 12:45.

    Transfers were charged at much less than full fare. Given that an incentive to tamper would be to extend to a later time to create a cheap ride, then the cutting system is tamper-proof. All later hours and minutes are cut off. The Dallas transfer above has a list of 17 bus lines. Each Dallas bus line had a name and number. (See page 12 of this Ford Presidential Library document) This later Dallas Bus map still tallies with the routes on the Globe transfer described above. 

    A review of the names and numbers of the 17 bus lines shows that routes are not systematically named for the ends of the lines, which would require two names. Instead, for the transfers, the Dallas lines were named unsystematically on the basis of any road or district of prominence on the line, e.g., 22 Beckley, 15 Ramona, and 30 Marsalis are names of middles and not ends of bus lines. Downtown was the start of the Beckley line. Lakewood is the district where the Ramona line and the Marsalis line started/ended. But Lakewood was also the name of a line itself. Its route – 23 – is shown in the FBI dossier (page 90, top right). It ran from the Lakewood district and terminated at Downtown, Union Station, and returned to Lakewood.

    A punched hole would indicate the relevant bus line. As did boxes indicating direction of travel “NSEW”, North, South, East and West, so that a passenger could not skip paying for a return ticket by doubling backward.

    But the Dallas transfer did have a “Shopper” box which, if punched, did enable someone who had asked for that form of transfer to get a return bus ride – once they had spent more than a dollar in a participating store. McWatters said that at that time of day, transfers were usually used by elderly people shopping.

    These lines crossed the Trinity River into Oak Cliff, thus,

    • Marsalis bus Line 30. Also known as “Munger”. The one Oswald was supposed to have boarded and then disembarked from. That ran from Lakewood, along Gaston through Downtown on Elm, over Houston St Viaduct along North and South Marsalis ending at Ann Arbor/Saner and back.
    • Ramona bus Line 15. That shared the same Downtown route as Marsalis until over the river, where it branched off Marsalis, to Ramona, ending at Singing Hills.
    • Elmwood Line 42. That ended south of the river at Elmwood (not to be confused with Ellwood) and has no relevance here.
    • The Beckley bus Line 22. That started Downtown, crossed the Trinity River on the Commerce Viaduct and went down North and South Beckley to Kiest and back. That would have been the direct bus for Oswald to go to work at the Depository from his 1026 N Beckley rooming house.
    • Other buses running along Beckley, Belmont Line 1 and Skillman Line 20. CE2694.

    The above-cited lines are all visible on the CE381-A transfer.

    The ticketing system Dallas used was widespread in the USA. The Reading Bus Co ticket, for example, is explicit on the ticket that the convention was that a punch indicated the line the journey had started on.

    That is consistent with wording on CE381-A stating 15-minute validity “for connecting lines”. Plural. Meaning any lines connecting with the one disembarked from and punched for. A passenger transferring on Elm from any one of Beckley, Marsalis, Elmwood, Skillman, Bellmont or Ramona would have – at least – the five other lines to choose to transfer to.

    IV. The Question about the Wrong Punch

    The transfer, which appears as CE381-A, is punched not for the Marsalis • 30 line but the Lakewood • 23 line. The Lakewood line in either direction would be of no use to Oswald – nor anyone else – heading to Oak Cliff. Counsel Ball asked McWatters why CE381-A would be punched for [Line 23] “Lakewood”.

    McWatters gave the Commission a convoluted story about punching the hole next to “Lakewood [23]” as Lakewood was an end of the Marsalis [30] route. He said in the following (my square brackets).

    “Going that way, while at Marsalis, I would punch the Lakewood when I would leave Marsalis coming toward Lakewood [hence northbound], I would have Lakewood on the front of my bus [hence also northbound] but I would punch the transfer Marsalis.”

    This is patently absurd. Firstly, he merely described northbound journeys in a different way but punched inconsistently. Secondly, even if he had his own system of punching “Lakewood” as a destination, it couldn’t possibly be a destination from a stop on one-way Elm Street for a Line 30 Marsalis bus heading south towards Marsalis.

    McWatters seems to be trying to find excuses for punching a transfer for the Lakewood Line 23 when he was driving the Marsalis 30 Line, and as per the photograph above, with “30 Marsalis” on the sign.

    McWatters’ account of him being called to the police department for the lineup chimes with Dhority above. McWatters was only shown the – problematic – Lakewood Line 23 transfer after he had attended the Oswald lineup.

    Mr. Ball. Now, you were called down to the Dallas police department later, weren’t you?

    Mr. McWatters. Yes, sir.

    Mr. Ball. What day was it?

    Mr. McWatters. It was on the same day, the 22d.

    Mr. Ball. 22d. Do you know how they happened to get in touch with you, did you notify them that you——

    Mr. McWatters. No, sir; I didn’t know anything to that effect.

    Mr. Ball. Did they come out and get you?

    Mr. McWatters. They come out and——

    Mr. Ball. What did they ask you?

    Mr. McWatters. Well, they stopped me; it was, I would say around 6:15 or somewhere around 6:15 or 6:20 that afternoon.

    Mr. Ball. You were still on duty, were you?

    Mr. McWatters. Yes, sir.

    Mr. Ball. Still on your bus?

    Mr. McWatters. I was on duty but I was on a different line and a different bus.

    Mr. Ball. What did they ask you when they came out?

    Mr. McWatters. Well, they stopped me right by the city hall there when I come by there and they wanted me to come in, they wanted to ask me some questions. And I don’t know what it was about or anything until I got in there and they told me what happened.

    Mr. Ball. What did they tell you?

    Mr. McWatters. Well, they told me that they had a transfer that I had issued that was cut for Lamar Street at 1 o’clock, and they wanted to know if I knew anything about it. And I, after I looked at the transfer and my punch, I said yes, that is the transfer I issued because it had my punch mark on it.

    It is perplexing how the police could have deduced Lamar. There is no reference to Lamar on the transfer. Ball picked up on that, with McWatters then confirming it was impossible.

    Mr. BALL – If this transfer was issued around the Lamar area or St. Paul–Elm area, is there any place that you could punch and show that particular location?
    Mr. McWATTERS – No, sir.

    McWatters then undermined his own assertion of Lamar with this.

    Mr. Ball. When you got to the police station that day did they show you a transfer?

    Mr. McWatters. Yes, sir.

    Mr. Ball. What did you tell them about the transfer?

    Mr. McWatters. Well, I recognized the transfer as being the transfer that I had issued.

    Mr. Ball. How did you recognize it?

    Mr. McWatters. By my punch mark on it.

    Mr. Ball. And what about the line?

    Mr. McWatters. The line?

    Mr. Ball. Lakewood.

    Mr. McWatters. The Lakewood punch on it, and where it was punched and Lakewood with my punch mark on it.

    The purpose of a transfer is to convey information to a different driver on the bus that the holder chooses to board next. A system needs consistency and understandability for passengers as well as drivers. What McWatters was saying is inconsistent and incomprehensible.

    Click here to read part 2.

  • New Revelations from the Recently Released RFK files – Part 1

    Did the LAPD invite the CIA into their RFK assassination investigation, or did the CIA push their way in? New documents definitively answer that question.

    New Revelations from the Recently Released RFK files – Part 1

    By Lisa Pease, author of A Lie Too Big to Fail

    Having extensively researched CIA and FBI files on both the JFK and RFK assassinations for more than 30 years, I’m uniquely positioned to identify what’s new and important in the recently released RFK files. So far, I have found three big stories in the recently released records. I’ll start with the first story and continue in subsequent articles to illuminate the other two important stories I’ve found. There are also several smaller stories, which I will get to eventually.

    Just before the RFK files were released, a reporter from CBS News contacted several people who have written books about the RFK assassination to ask what they expected to find in the files. I told the reporter I was especially eager to see the CIA files, as I knew they had been involved in the LAPD’s investigation but had only seen portions of the LAPD’s communications, never the responses.[1]

    It’s a fact that the CIA was involved in the LAPD’s assassination investigation. But there could be innocent or sinister theories for why that would be. If the LAPD had invited the CIA into the case, that could indicate the CIA was not involved and was only summoned due to their ability to track down information about the numerous foreigners who became, however temporarily, part of the LAPD’s investigation. However, it could also have been possible that the LAPD invited the CIA into the investigation because they had planned it together. If, on the other hand, the CIA had invited themselves into the investigation, that would reveal a vested interest in the outcome of the investigation and would also appear to exonerate the LAPD in the planning of the assassination.

    So the first thing I wanted to know from the files was simply that: did the LAPD invite the CIA in? Or did the CIA invite themselves in?

    The first semi-answer came from an important CIA file released back in 2021, that I did not see until this year, after my book came out and after the updated paperback version had gone to print, that contained two documents.

    The first page of the 2021-released document was the CIA’s response to Dan Rather’s questions about whether Manny Pena and Enrique “Hank” Hernandez, the two LAPD officers in charge of the conspiracy side of the investigations of “Special Unit Senator,” the Los Angeles Police Department unit formed to investigate RFK’s assassination, had worked for the CIA. The CIA denied any connection, despite the fact that both of them had been credibly linked to the CIA.[2]

    I had seen the first document in the files years earlier and had to laugh upon seeing it again because the CIA has been known, frequently, to lie on the record when people got too close to their ties to the assassinations of the 1960s. In fact, several years back, I saw a comment in a forum where a poster said to his knowledge, the CIA had never lied to the Warren Commission. I was able to find a lie the CIA made to the Warren Commission in five minutes. Helms denied to the Warren Commission that the CIA had ever had any interest in Oswald, a lie that is now completely exposed with previous and current file releases.

    In the recently released RFK files, there is another “big lie” file about Oswald, also in response to the Dan Rather inquiries, in which the CIA goes to great lengths to say they knew nothing about Oswald before the assassination, something proven to be ridiculously false over the years, and something even Dan Rather raised questions about in his special.

    The second document in the 2021 file, however, dropped a bombshell, albeit with lawyerly language:

    Sirhan Sirhan’s security file reflects that he had never been of interest to the Agency prior to the assassination of Robert Kennedy. On 5 June 1968 when Sirhan was identified as the probable assassin, the Director of Central Intelligence met with the Deputy Chief of the CI Staff, the Assistant Deputy Director for Plans, and the Director of Security and directed that the CI staff would be the focal point for action in the Sirhan case. The CI staff was to collect all available information on Sirhan and provide appropriate portions of this material to the Office of Security for release to the Los Angeles Police Department. This material was to be released to the LAPD through the Office of Security’s Los Angeles Field Office.[3]

    (I found the use of “reflects that” telling, as if the file might have had more in it at one time but has been altered to “reflect” a certain version of events.)

    So James Angleton’s CIA Counterintelligence group was designated as the records collection point for the RFK assassination investigation, just as his team had run point for the JFK assassination, and could control what was released to the LAPD from the CIA’s end, by the CIA’s OS LAFO contact:

    Mr. William Curtin, the Special Agent in Charge of the Los Angeles Field Office, contacted Inspector Yarnell of the LAPD on 5 June 1968 and advised him that the Agency was prepared to cooperate with the LAPD in its investigation of Sirhan.

    From that one sentence, it appeared CIA initiated contact with the CIA first, but I wasn’t ready to declare a conclusion until I read Sirhan’s 815-page 201 file, released in 2025 by the Luna Committee. In there, we find this important bit of information from William Curtin himself:

    When the announcement of the Subject’s [Sirhan’s] identity and foreign background was made public on 5 June 1968, upon instructions from Headquarters, I contacted Inspector Harold YARNELL, in the absence of [LAPD] Chief Tom REDDIN.[4]

    Inspector Yarnell was a member of the LEIU – the Law Enforcement Intelligence Unit – a private network of intelligence officers at various police departments across the country. Yarnell had been the Secretary-Treasurer of the LEIU and became the Commander of the LAPD Intelligence Division, where he interfaced with, among others, Lt. Jack Revill of the Dallas Police Department (named chief of the Dallas Intelligence Unit).[5]

    But it’s what Curtin wrote next that proved the CIA had forced its way into the investigation and not been invited:

    Inspector Yarnell was informed of our desire to aid the Los Angeles Police Department in any way that we could in the conduct of their investigation of the Subject. He expressed his appreciation and stated that they would gladly accept any information we wished to pass along to them. However, he advised that their case against the Subject appeared to be airtight and that he did not at that time foresee that they would be calling on us for any assistance.[6]

    In other words, the LAPD’s response to the CIA’s offer of help had been essentially, thank you, but no thank you. That is quite notable. The LAPD didn’t yet know what they didn’t know. But the CIA knew there would be things the LAPD didn’t know, names that would need to be investigated.

    Twelve days later, Inspector Yarnell called William back and set up a meeting with Yarnell, Captain Brown (the Chief of Homicide at LAPD) and Curtin. At this point, Yarnell’s tune changed slightly. Although they felt they had a rock-solid case against Sirhan (which they didn’t—see my book for why the case for Sirhan’s guilt falls flat), Yarnell said they were pursuing a possible conspiracy angle and needed information about Sirhan and possible associates. The CIA’s one request in response is that all mention of their cooperation be kept from the press. And for the most part, it was.

    But I find even this confession of the alliance and circumstances possibly incomplete, because Sirhan had not yet been identified when Chief Reddin gave his 7:00 a.m. press conference on June 5. As I wrote in my book, after viewing the tape from that conference:

    Throughout the press conference, Reddin’s delivery was calm, articulate, and professional, until he came to one particular question. He had just explained that the LAPD was checking with other agencies for any information they might have on the suspect— “the immigration service, the CIA, the Bureau of Customs, Social Security, the Post Office department—”

    “Why the CIA, Chief?” a reporter asked.

    Suddenly, Reddin became visibly rattled and nearly choked as he tried to get the agency’s name out. “The C-A … the C-A … the C-I-A has types of information that might help us identify who the person might be. We’ll give them his picture.” Reddin regained his composure shortly after, but it was a bizarre break—and the only such break—in an otherwise seamless presentation.[7]

    Perhaps Reddin had learned of the CIA’s call to Captain Brown and was planning to share their unknown suspect’s picture with the CIA, but right about this time, Munir Sirhan, the brother of Sirhan who was at his early morning job and watching the TV in the breakroom saw a picture of his brother on TV and went with his brother Adel to the local Pasadena police to identify him. So maybe Curtin’s timeline is an official lie.

    There’s also the weird question the LAPD asked Sirhan about him being married. After the shooting, Sirhan was extensively questioned for a few hours before Reddin heard Sirhan had asked for a lawyer and shut down the questioning. The LAPD and the DA’s assistant who questioned him recognized Sirhan was in some sort of dissociative state. He couldn’t remember what kind of car he drove and couldn’t or wouldn’t give his name. Even his interrogators didn’t believe he was lying. Before his identity had been revealed, one LAPD officer asked Sirhan if he were married (to which Sirhan replied, quite oddly, that he didn’t know).

    It turns out the CIA knew of another man called “Sirhan Sirhan” in the United States who was married, and had been married in 1957 (Sirhan Sirhan had never married and would have only been 13 at the time!), and a reporter with ties to the CIA and Israel named John Kimche had written about him a week after the assassination took place. Kimche thought the Sirhan he was writing about was the Sirhan Sirhan in custody because his source had been right so many times before. The CIA tracked down the man, identified by a friend as “Sirhan Sirhan,” and reported back that he was really Sirhan Salim Sirhan Abu Khadir, a resident of Detroit.”[8] But who told the LAPD within hours after the shooting that the guy in custody might have been married? Might the CIA have planted this story with Kimche after the fact to explain earlier initial misinformation? Had someone from Israel called it in to try to paint Sirhan as someone with ties to Al Fatah (which Sirhan Bishara Sirhan did not have)? Maybe the LAPD just asked if he was married for no reason. But they also asked if his name was “Jesse,” and there was, in fact, a suspect named “Jesse” that apparently had been taken into custody separately from Sirhan and released. So the question may not have been random at all.

    There are still many mysteries in this case. But the CIA pushing their way into the LAPD’s investigation, while not surprising to those who have long assumed a CIA hand in the assassination of RFK, is genuinely new information, with genuinely sinister implications.

    (Part 2 coming soon)

     

    1. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-gabbard-rfk-assassination-files-release/

    2. Lisa Pease, A Lie Too Big to Fail: The Real History of the Assassination of Robert F. Kennedy (Feral House: 2025 paperback edition), pp. 98-99.

    3. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/SIRHAN%20SIRHAN%20INVESTIGATI%5B16011338%5D.pdf, p. 4

    4. https://test-ks-and-k.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/07165005_sirhan_sirhan_201.pdf, p. 24

    5. https://test-ks-and-k.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/1979_NARMIC_Police-Threat-to-Political-Liberty.pdf, page 52.

    6. https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/SIRHAN%20SIRHAN%20201%5B16506077%5D.pdf, p. 74

    7. Lisa Pease, A Lie Too Big to Fail: The Real History of the Assassination of Robert F. Kennedy (Feral House: 2025 paperback edition), p. 58.

    8. Sirhan 201 file, p. 779.

  • Clay Shaw in Italy – Part 2

    Did Permindex do away with Mattei? And was having Lemnitzer in charge of Gladio and the assassination specialist Bill Harvey in Rome part of the endgame for JFK?

    Clay Shaw in Italy: Amid Permindex and Gladio, Part 2

    In Part 1, we have established the enormous influence of Licio Gelli and Propaganda Due, and its association with Permindex/Centro Mondiale Commerciale. This was through someone, only Michele Metta discovered, namely, Roberto Ascarelli. As noted, both groups met in his offices, and he served on the board of Permindex/CMC. Now that we have presented this new and compelling information, it is appropriate to review some already established material before proceeding forward again.

    As noted, Clay Shaw always denied he had any association with the CIA. He did this in public, and he also declared it under oath on the stand at his trial. This, of course, turned out to be a canard. The declassified record adduced by the ARRB has proven it as such. As William Davy showed in his book, Shaw had a covert security clearance, and he was so valued that he was issued a Y file. (William Davy, Let Justice be Done, p. 195, p. 199). As Joan Mellen later discovered, Shaw was a highly paid CIA contract agent. (Our Man in Haiti, pp. 54-55) In an internal communication, the ARRB’s CIA analyst, Manuel Legaspi, stated that the Agency had severely altered Shaw’s 201 file. But, as previously mentioned, we do know that Shaw did work for the CIA “over a five year span in Italy.” (Davy, p. 100)

    When Ference Nagy first announced plans for a business organization in Basel, this met with criticism in the papers due to some of the people involved. That would include Nagy himself, since the year before he had been referred to as “a long-time asset of CIA Deputy Director of Plans, Frank Wisner.”(Maurice Phillips’ blog, 10/15/10) According to the Soviets, Nagy had a role in the Hungarian uprising of 1956. (New York Times, 11/8/56) In declassified documents by the ARRB, Nagy was revealed to be “a cleared contact of the International Organizations Division. His 201 file contains a number of references to his association with the World Trade Center.” (CIA document of 3/24/67)

    When the financial banking for Nagy’s new enterprise was announced, it raised even more controversy. (State Department Memo, 1/15/57) The first bank announced was J. Henry Schroder’s. This bank was closely associated with the CIA and Director Allen Dulles. The Dulles law firm, Sullivan and Cromwell, used Schroder’s in dealing with the Nazis in the late thirties. When Dulles became director, that bank was a repository for a 50-million-dollar contingency fund he controlled. (Davy, p. 96) That financial conglomerate was a prime source as a conduit for CIA fronts like the Kaplan Foundation and a half dozen others like it. (ibid)

    So Schroder’s now denied its backing. Another bank stepped in, namely, Hans Seligman’s. The State Department was curious about this since Seligman’s was a much smaller house than Schroder’s. When the American consul interviewed Nagy and Seligman, he found them to be rather cautious in revealing the firms backing the project. But Seligman had a reputation for cooperating with the fascists during the war. And also, like Schroder’s, Seligman’s bank was also in the Sullivan and Cromwell financial orbit. (State Department cables of 2/1/57 and 11/7/58; S. Menshikov, Millionaires and Managers, p. 297)

    Due to the characters involved, the questionable backing, plus attacks in the press, the project stalled. But it was now ascertained that the International Trade Mart was a model for Permindex, and that Clay Shaw of the ITM had shown “from the outset great interest in the Permindex project.” (State Department cables of 4/9/58 and 7/18/58) This prompted a visit to New Orleans by certain Swiss officials in 1957. (State Department cable of 11/7/58) In the spring of 1958, Enrico Mantello and his father Giorgio—a main player in the Permindex scheme—traveled to New Orleans and met with Shaw. This was after an exchange of letters between the two parties. (Nagy collection at Columbia University, sourced by Ed Berger.) Nagy seemed to be determined now to move to Rome, and Secretary of State John Foster Dulles somehow heard of this. In a memo of September of 1958 requesting aid for Nagy in Italy, the document originates at Commerce but it has Foster Dulles’ name on it at the end.

    Nagy then announced that Permindex would be opening up an affiliate called Centro Mondiale Commerciale in Rome. According to a Time-Life internal memo, Shaw visited their new HQ prior to its official opening. This was a 37,000 square foot office building originally constructed in 1942. Shaw was then reported by the State Department to be on the Board of Directors. (State Department cable of 11/7/58)

    As Maurice Phillips and Metta have pointed out, there was a Canadian connection to CMC. This was through former Major Louis Bloomfield. In a letter written by Bloomfield on February 4, 1960, he noted that Nagy had met with David Rockefeller the previous day. Bloomfield was supposed to be there, but due to a temporary health affliction, he could not attend. Bloomfield described the meeting as successful, and he planned on meeting with Rockefeller in a week or so. (From Bloomfield to Ernest Wolf) As the Bloomfield archive, as excavated by Maurice Phillips, showed, it was not just Rockefeller who was in the Permindex outer circle, but also Baron Edmund de Rothschild. Both men were being solicited as investors. In other words, those involved in Permindex were in contact with two of the richest and most powerful men in the world at that time. (Letter by Bloomfield to Abraham Friedman of April 1, 1959)

    II

    There was another side to Permindex/CMC. As William Davy notes in his book about Jim Garrison, Ferenc Nagy was a close acquaintance to, and supportive of, Jacques Soustelle. (Let Justice be Done, p. 99) Soustelle had been the governor-general of Algeria and had worked for President Charles DeGaulle. But he had broken with the president over his policy of an independence solution to the war with Algerian rebels—a policy which President Kennedy had advocated since 1957. Soustelle had traveled to Washington in the early sixties and met with CIA officers. He was pleading for support for the OAS, a group of breakaway military officers trying to overthrow and/or kill DeGaulle. According to Andrew Tully in his book CIA: The Inside Story, the meeting was a success. Many years later, it was revealed to the Church Committee that the Agency had aided in a scheme to assassinate DeGaulle. (Chicago Tribune, June 15, 1975)

    We should also note something on a lower level that is pertinent. In the 1961 raid on the weapons cache in Houma, Louisiana DA Jim Garrison discovered that some of the arms that were lifted and sent to Guy Banister’s office were CIA stockpiled weaponry on loan to the OAS group. (Garrison, On the Trail of the Assassins, p. 90) In tracing the money used to finance the plots against DeGaulle, French intelligence discovered that about $200,000 in covert funding had been sent to Permindex accounts in the Banque de la Credit Internationale. In 1962, Banister sent to Paris his lawyer colleague Maurice Gatlin, who was a member of Banister’s Anti-Communist League of the Caribbean. Gatlin reportedly had a suitcase full of money for the OAS, estimated at around $200,000. (Jim Marrs, Crossfire, pp. 499-500)

    This relates to another explosive disclosure by Michele Metta in his first book on the Centro Mondiale Commerciale. Enrico Mattei was the miracle man who turned the National Fuel Trust (ENI) of the Italian government into a formidable force in petroleum markets on the world stage. Mattei was controversial in his policies as he made key petroleum deals in the Middle East and significant agreements with the USSR. In the former instance, he agreed to lower concessions in order to gain new drilling rights. In the latter case, he agreed to purchase 12 million tons of Russian crude oil. (Time, 11/2/62)

    Mattei’s maneuvering weakened the Rockefeller/Shell/British Petroleum-controlled Seven Sisters oil monopoly that had dominated oil markets through the 20th century. (The attorney for that oil monopoly was John McCloy of the Warren Commission.) Mattei also broke with tradition in his policies toward countries where the oil was discovered. He insisted that they get up to 75% of the profits. He stated that he thought the giant foreign oil companies were preying on the Italian market by rigging higher prices. In a clear jab at the Seven Sisters, he once said:

    The policy I am following has permitted me not only to free my country from the grip of the cartel, but to benefit from prices lower than those which our neighbors pay. (Ibid)

    Mattei was so successful in his endeavors that he expanded the reach of the ENI into motels, cafes, service stations, newspapers and factories producing synthetic rubber. ENI was estimated to be worth 2 billion in 1962. Mattei was said to have played a major role in spurring the enormous growth in the Italian economy during his years as director. He donated his salary to an orphanage. And one should also note this: like Kennedy and DeGaulle, he wanted France out of Algeria.

    III

    Mattei’s brilliant reign came to an end on October 27, 1962. He perished in a mysterious plane crash, which recalled the murder of Dag Hammarskjold the previous year. (See the book Who Killed Hammarskjold? by Susan Williams) At the beginning of 1962, Mattei’s pilot discovered an attempt to sabotage his plane. Therefore, Mattei now ordered an identical aircraft which he would choose between on short notice. After his death, the wreckage was removed very quickly, and the identical plane was sold off in parts to parties in America. Film director Francesco Rosi commissioned a script after a journalist reported a significant discovery in the case. That journalist then disappeared –forever. But not before he said, “I have a scoop that is going to shake Italy.” (See, “The Mystery of Enrico Mattei’s Death” at Ecco le marche web site; see also La Repubblica, story by Attilio Bolzoni 6/18/2005)

    Although Rosi did make his film, it did not get very much exposure in America, and neither did Mattei’s death. But the matter did inspire much private inquiry in Italy. Vincenzo Calia was one of the more important researchers. In fact, Calia changed the verdict about the crash for most later biographies of Mattei. His work altered those references from a plane malfunction to sabotage of Mattei’s aircraft. Calia advanced powerful evidence that the plane went down because of an explosion. (Michele Metta, CMC, p. 132)

    Metta was loaned Calia’s research materials. In one of the interviews Calia did, he talked to a writer named Fulvio Bellini. In one of Bellini’s books, he had gone over the problems Mattei was having with his immediate superior, who was opposed to some of his policies and, in fact, was close to Borghese. Bellini referred to the Centro Mondiale Commerciale as: “The terminal in Italy of the group who attend to all the dirty work in world politics, including the assassination of Enrico Mattei.” (Italics added)

    Bellini then went even further. He said that, to understand the death of Mattei, one had to follow the trail to none other than Soustelle. Bellini said Soustelle was given the job of performing, what he referred to as, Operation Mattei. He then concluded that Soustelle was given around 100,000 dollars to do so from Montreal through Permindex. (Ibid., p. 133)

    We can speculate about the Montreal connection. That is where Bloomfield operated from with the shares of Permindex stock. And he was enlisting the likes of David Rockefeller and Edmund de Rothschild as investors. I do not have to refer to how much interest Rockefeller had in the Seven Sisters: two of the seven were Rockefeller-controlled, Chevron and Exxon.

    Two more elements should be mentioned regarding this Metta discovery. A young man named Jules Ricco Kimble was a friend of David Ferrie’s who introduced him to Clay Shaw. One day in late 1961—perhaps early 1962—Ferrie called him and asked if he wanted to take a plane ride with him. Kimble agreed and met Ferrie at the airport, where he learned that Shaw would be joining them. Ferrie made some stops to refuel, but their last stop was Montreal. The trip was for an overnight stay, and Shaw did not rejoin them until the next morning. A bit later, Ferrie called him again to make another flight into Canada, but Kimble declined. (Garrison, p. 118)

    Finally, to add more intrigue to what Bellini noted, Metta reports that Soustelle was meeting with former Italian prime minister Fernando Tambroni in Rome in the latter part of 1961. Tambroni had been financed by a member of P2. (Metta, Accomplishing Jim Garrison’s Investigation, p. 362) Tambroni’s son-in-law was a member of the CMC. Tambroni had been involved in the central government in three different positions for eight years prior to becoming prime minister. But he was so right-wing that riots took place against him, and he lost office after about five months. Tambroni and Soustelle met at the building housing a reactionary group of Tambroni’s called Civil Order. Italian intelligence also suspected it to be the headquarters of the OAS in Italy. (Metta, CMC, p. 131)

    IV

    Gladio experts Philip Willan and Daniele Ganser mention the role of Frank Gigliotti in reviving masonry, and aiding Gladio in Italy after the war. Willan, for instance, describes Gigliotti as a former OSS and CIA agent. (Puppetmasters, p. 58) Gigliotti, who had spent years in Italy as a young man, was a Presbyterian pastor who was anti-communist and pro-Mussolini in the thirties. He then became an OSS agent against Il Duce during the war. He joined up with the CIA afterwards and, as noted, was quite active in the revival of Italian masonry. In 1960, he was very much pro-Nixon and anti-Kennedy. (Metta, CMC, pp. 10-12)

    Beyond that, more than one source has stated that it was Gigliotti who secretly recruited Licio Gelli. The Tina Anselmi P2 Commission thought it was important to note that when Gigliotti left the scene, Gelli took the stage. (Metta, Accomplishing Jim Garrison’s Investigation, p. 65) According to Ganser’s NATO’s Secret Armies, it was Gigliotti who instructed Licio to construct an anti-Communist network in Italy associated with the Rome CIA station. In fact, CIA Director Allen Dulles was actually contributing millions of lire to funding this kind of militant neo-fascist network there. (Metta, CMC, p. 15)

    What makes this even more intriguing is this: one of Kennedy’s enemies, William Harvey, was stationed in Ganser’s Rome CIA station in 1963. Another enemy, Lyman Lemnitzer, ran NATO forces and, therefore, Gladio, in that same year. Both men had been guilty of insubordination at the White House in 1962.

    Lemnitzer’s rise in the Pentagon was largely owed to General Dwight Eisenhower; Lemnitzer planned operations in North Africa and Italy. Once he became president, Eisenhower made him commander of Far East forces, then Army Chief of Staff, and then JCS chair—all in the space of five years. (Cottrell, pp. 86-87) According to James Bamford, “in Lemnitzer’s view, the country would be far better off if the generals could take over.” (Ibid., p. 92)

    To put it mildly, this was not what JFK thought. As chair of the Joint Chiefs, Lemnitzer was opposed to Kennedy’s policies in both Vietnam and Cuba. He was close to Col. Edwin Lansdale, who was in charge of Operation Mongoose. Lemnitzer had been in on a false flag plan against Cuba under the Eisenhower administration. (John Newman, Into the Storm, p. 372) Lansdale himself now thought up the idea of staging a fake Cuban attack at Guantanamo in order to provoke an American invasion. This actually preceded the infamous Operation Northwoods, the series of false flag plans devised by the Joint Chiefs to provoke an invasion of the island.

    The problem was that not only was Kennedy against such a provocation, he did not even want to hear about it. (Newman, p. 385) Yet on March 13, 1962, Northwoods was presented to JFK. Then Lemnitzer suggested that America did not even need a pretext; we could just invade, which Kennedy was clearly against.

    On Vietnam, Lemnitzer said that Kennedy’s policy would lead to “communist domination of all of the Southeast Asian mainland.” He even said Australia and New Zealand would be threatened. (Newman, p. 391) Notably, this was after the November 1961 Kennedy decision that there would be no combat troops in Indochina, only advisors. According to a conversation John Newman had with the present writer, the JCS knew there were ICBM missiles in Cuba before Kennedy did. They wanted to force JFK’s back against the wall to see how he would respond. They did not care for the peaceful and equitable result. Kennedy ended up removing Lemnitzer in the fall of 1962 (Newman, p. 396). But he made a mistake and sent him to Europe to oversee NATO forces.

    V

    Bill Harvey began his career in the FBI, but he was too much of a hard drinker for J. Edgar Hoover to tolerate. So he joined the CIA, and he liked to needle the Ivy League officers by pulling out his gun during meetings and spinning the cylinder. (David Talbot, The Devil’s Chessboard, p. 469) He supervised the Berlin station and got to know Reinhard Gehlen and his network there. When he returned stateside, he wanted to run the Soviet Russia division, but he was assigned to Staff D, signals intelligence, with which he worked on with the National Security Agency. (ibid., pp. 470-71)

    Buried inside Staff D was a project called ZR/Rifle. This was the development of an assassination program commissioned by Dick Bissell. Prior to this, James Angleton supervised a small assassination team run by Colonel Borish Pash. (James Douglas, JFK and The Unspeakable, p. 143) Both men, Angleton and Harvey, visited with British intelligence officer Peter Wright about the subject of assassinations. (Wright, Spycatcher, p. 204) In fact, the Church Committee discovered that Harvey had made notes about blaming an assassination on a communist–either a Czechoslovak or a Soviet. He also noted that the patsy’s CIA 201 file should be rigged in advance. Which, as HSCA staffer Betsy Wolf showed, Oswald’s was. (Vasilios Vazakas, “Creating the Oswald Legend, Pt. 4” at Kennedys and King.) According to the Church Committee, both QJ WIN and WI ROGUE were Harvey’s recruits, and both were sent to Congo to take part in the plot to eliminate Patrice Lumumba. (See Midnight in the Congo, by Lisa Pease, Probe, Vol. 6 No. 3)

    In 1962, Harvey was supervising Task Force W, directly involved with Cuba. Bobby Kennedy was the ombudsman of the overall project called Mongoose. Harvey deeply resented RFK’s fastidious veto power over CIA requests for operations. As David Corn showed in his book on Ted Shackley, Allen Dulles approved of these by rote orally. Bobby wanted them in writing and in detail. Harvey grew to hate the Kennedy brothers, especially Robert. He said his actions bordered on treason. (Talbot, p. 472)

    What the Kennedys did not know was that Harvey was also in charge of the second phase of the CIA/Mafia plots to kill Castro, which were going on while Mongoose was proceeding. Harvey had teamed with mobster John Roselli to try to assassinate Fidel. This went on for months on end; there is evidence that it extended into the spring of 1963. (Larry Hancock, Someone Would Have Talked, pp. 148-49) But what got Harvey in deep trouble was his actions during the Missile Crisis. At one of the hottest points of that confrontation, Harvey sent teams of “sixty agents into Cuba to support any conventional military operations”. (Dick Russell, The Man Who Knew Too Much, p. 151) Bobby Kennedy was enraged by this. At that moment, the slightest provocation could have brought on atomic warfare. RFK wanted him fired, but Richard Helms shuffled him off to Rome.

    VI

    While in Rome, Harvey formed an alliance with General Giovanni DeLorenzo, who, as we saw in part one, planned a 1964 coup called Piano Solo. Harvey was also friendly with the notorious Michele Sindona, the fraudster who almost caused the Vatican bank to collapse. Harvey also met with a man who was instrumental in the Strategy of Tension, Renzo Rocca. Harvey gave Rocca a list of names of far-right zealots who would help in carrying out that strategy. As with ZR/Rifle, Harvey wanted to create a team of thugs who would be “capable of killing, placing bombs and firebombs, and promoting propaganda.” One of the first people whom Rocca talked to after this meeting was Valerio Borghese, Angleton’s friend, and the man who would attempt another coup in 1970. (Metta, Accomplishing Jim Garrison’s Investigation, p. 88)

    Harvey was continuing an old CIA policy first implemented by Allen Dulles in a 1951 document. Dulles wanted the Christian Democrats to treat the Italian communists not as Italians but as communists. He wanted them discriminated against through legislative enactments, administrative harassment, suppression and also control. The project was called Operation Demagnetize, and it was cooperated on between the CIA and SIFAR, the then Italian secret service. (Ibid., p. 43) Years later, the Christian Democrats were very worried about how their full cooperation with the CIA would look if it was fully exposed to the Anselmi Commission on P2. And in fact, Anselmi’s notes make it clear that the Christian Democrats did all they could to close down her investigation. (ibid., pp. 64-65)

    The fear was real. Because eventually Judge Felice Casson came to the conclusion that P2 had been involved in the attacks of the strategy of tension “and that the secret society was acting as a proxy for the CIA.” And that inquiry concluded that P2 and Gelli were not just doing so in Italy but in Argentina, and that Jorge Mario Bergoglio, who later became Pope Francis I, was cognizant of it. This is how powerful Gelli and P2 were. (Paul Williams, Operation Gladio, p. 110) They were involved with the assassination program in South America called Operation Condor. (Cottrell, p. 127)

    The only other part of Gladio that was likely as impactful as the P2/ Permindex aspect was Yves Guerin-Serac, who led another CIA shell company called Aginter Press. Guerin-Sac was part of the OAS plots to kill DeGaulle. When they failed, he fled to Portugal for what he called, “ …a truly western league of struggle against Marxism.” (Cottrell, p. 118) And, in fact, Aginter Press was involved in the Strategy of Tension in Italy by blowing up a bank in Milan in 1969. Guerin-Sac and Aginter Press were allied with Otto Skorzeny and his gun-for-hire Paladin Group. At one time, in the Paladin group bureau in Zurich, offices of both Permindex and the CMC were located. (Cottrell, p. 125)

    In Rome, Harvey’s deputy was F. Mark Wyatt. Wyatt acted as a buffer between the rather unrefined Harvey and the locals; and unlike Harvey, he spoke fluent Italian. He was knowledgeable about Harvey’s attempts through SIFAR and Rocca to carry out bombings on Christian Democrat offices and blame them on the left. (Talbot, The Devil’s Chessboard, p. 475). Harvey also entertained the idea of using the Mafia to murder Italian communists. On the day Kennedy was killed, Harvey blurted out some disturbing remarks that stayed with Wyatt the rest of his life. In fact, his children wanted him to testify before the House Select Committee on Assassinations. He declined.

    But during an interview Wyatt did with a French journalist at his retirement home in Lake Tahoe in 1998, he did say something quite provocative. As the writer left, he said: “You know, I always wondered what Bill Harvey was doing in Dallas in November 1963.” The reporter was shocked. Wyatt explained that he bumped into Harvey on a flight to Dallas a bit before the assassination. When he asked his boss what he was doing there, Harvey said rather nebulously: “I’m here to see what’s happening.” (Talbot, p. 477) And thanks to the Luna committee we have just found out that CIA documents reveal that Harvey had permission to fly under an FAA-approved alias in 1963 in the USA.

    As the reader can see, those attempting to label Permindex a Russian disinformation story– like Max Holland–are simply and utterly wrong. It and P2 and Gladio and the Strategy of Tension were all too real.

    Click here to read part 1.

  • Clay Shaw in Italy – Part 1

    A new and wider look at what Clay Shaw was up to in Italy, set against the backdrop of Gladio, the Strategy of Tension,  Propaganda Due and the utmost fascist: Licio Gelli.

    Clay Shaw in Italy: Amid Permindex and Gladio

    Back in 1992, when I initially went to New Orleans, I interviewed some of Clay Shaw’s remaining family and friends. One of the things that was repeated to me was that he liked to travel; it was not just part of his job as a businessman and as the face of the International Trade Mart. We know about some of these journeys through declassified records. For instance, Shaw filed reports with the CIA from various countries in Europe and Latin America: Peru, Argentina, Nicaragua, and Czechoslovakia. (William Davy, Let Justice Be Done, pp. 198-99)

    But further, Shaw was such a valued asset that the Agency gave him what was called a “Y” number. Shaw’s reports under that rubric include “Observations on International Fairs at Milan, Brussels, Basel, Paris and London/Comments on Western European Economics and Desire to Trade with the Soviet Bloc.” (Davy, p. 199). These journeys explain why Shaw frequented the VIP room of Eastern Air Lines and used his alias of Clay Bertrand to sign in there. (James DiEugenio, Destiny Betrayed, second edition, p. 278)

    But from these relatives, I understood that Shaw’s favorite countries in Europe were England, and even more so, Italy. Shaw was likely introduced to Britain during his service in World War II. (Paris Flammonde, The Kennedy Conspiracy, p. 76) But it is clear through Anthony Frewin–writing under the pen name Anthony Edward Weeks– that Shaw still held British contacts after the war. One of the pieces of evidence that DA Jim Garrison recovered from Shaw’s home was his address book. Since Frewin lives in England, he began to look up some of these persons and penned a 12-page article on the subject. He wrote that the first thing that struck him about the address book was that Shaw’s British contacts all lived in the best, most expensive areas, e.g., Belgravia, Mayfair, Kensington, etc. (see Lobster, No. 20) On a phone call I had with the author, he stated, this guy was not Joe Sixpack. As we shall see, that is an understatement.

    About Shaw’s visits to Italy, the FBI seems to have understood that they were not just social. As the Garrison investigation discovered through an acquaintance of Bureau official Regis Kennedy, “Shaw was a CIA agent who had done work, of an unspecified nature, over a five-year span in Italy.” (Davy, p. 100) As William Davy comments, this almost has to be in reference to Shaw’s service with Permindex/Centro Mondiale Commerciale in Rome. As Davy suggested, this is fascinating, and not just because of Permindex itself. But because one of the main organizers of that business group was Ferenc Nagy, the former prime minister of Hungary. Nagy fled Hungary due to a leftist overthrow in 1947. From the USA, he then became a backer of the Hungarian anti-communist émigré community.

    But Nagy was also a friend of Jacques Soustelle. Soustelle was a former Governor-General of Algeria under Charles de Gaulle. But he split with the French president over the issue of independence for Algeria. Soustelle became a backer of the OAS, the rebel military group that tried to both assassinate and overthrow de Gaulle over the independence movement in Algeria, which Soustelle opposed. There is very little doubt that Soustelle had implicit backing from the CIA on this issue. (Davy, p. 99; James DiEugenio, JFK Revisited, pp. 99-100) And, as we shall see, Soustelle figures into the whole Permindex black op backdrop.

    There is another connection with Permindex and Shaw, which is important to note in advance. It was not revealed until 2003, perhaps as one of the Assassination Record Review Board’s (ARRB) delayed declassifications. An Agency document dated from June 28, 1978 described Clay Shaw’s service to CIA as encompassing from 1949-72. That document made reference to a claim “that CIA used Shaw for service in Italy with U.S. agent Major Louis Mortimer Bloomfield.” Shaw’s part is described as making connections with political circles and the business world in Rome, and also with developing relationships with extreme rightwing groups. As we shall see, this was accomplished, and the Canadian high-powered lawyer Bloomfield was an integral part of it. (Joan Mellen, A Farewell to Justice, p. 389)

    II

    Since 1948, Italy had been a high priority for the then-nascent Central Intelligence Agency. In fact, it was the subject of the first National Security Council meeting in late 1947. (John Ranelagh, The Agency, p. 115) Secretary of Defense James Forrestal was concerned about a communist victory in the 1948 Italian elections. Therefore, a directive was issued initiating propaganda and psychological warfare activities to marginalize the leftist parties and promote the Christian Democrats as a bulwark against them. Both the CIA and the State Department participated in this campaign. It was implemented through both the Agency’s Office of Special Operations and, according to Christopher Simpson’s book Blowback, also through the law offices of Sullivan and Cromwell. The latter being the home of the Dulles brothers, John Foster and Allen. At that location, Allen Dulles, Frank Wisner, James Angleton, Bill Colby and others went to work supervising the rigging of the vote.

    There was a real possibility that the Italian communists and their allies would win the 1948 elections outright. Which meant they would have a foothold in Western Europe. (Simpson, pp. 89-90) For obvious reasons, this possibility was also a nightmare for the Vatican: to have Godless communism in your own backyard? As Bishop James Griffiths, an American emissary to the Vatican, wrote, they feared a “disastrous failure at the polls which will put Italy behind the Iron Curtain.” (Simpson, p. 90) According to Simpson, the CIA laundered ten million dollars to give directly to the Vatican for anti-communist agitation purposes. This was only one part of an enormous 350 million dollar overall total for the American crusade in Italy.

    This fear and this expenditure were justified to these Cold Warriors because in 1946, the Italian Communist party—at that time the largest in the world outside of Russia—and the Socialists had actually outpolled the Christian Democrats for the Constituent Assembly. (William Blum, The CIA: A Forgotten History, p. 23). But because they were separate parties, they had to settle for a coalition government under a Christian Democrat premier. In 1947, a party of American congressmen stopped off in Italy and announced the theme of the upcoming election:

    The country is under great pressure from within and without to veer to the left and adopt a totalitarian-collective national organization. (Blum, p. 24)

    The two leftist parties were going to unite in 1948 to form the Popular Democratic Front (FDP), and early in the year had won local elections in Pescara, defeating the Christian Democrats. As Bill Colby later wrote:

    It was primarily this fear that led to the formation of the Office of Policy Coordination which gave the CIA the capability to undertake covert political propaganda and paramilitary operations in the first place. (Blum, p 25)

    This is how important these elections seemed to Washington. Because there was a question in the CIA Director’s mind about legality, the forming of a new department was created to do such missions in the future. And this had both presidential and congressional permission. (Ranelagh, p. 115)

    James Angleton also had a special interest in Italy. His father, who had business in the National Cash Register company, moved his family there when Jim was fourteen. Hugh Angleton was a colonel in the OSS during the war. An operations officer, Max Corvo, said of Hugh’s politics, “He was ultra-conservative, a sympathizer with Fascist officials. He was certainly not unfriendly with the Fascists.” (Tom Mangold, Cold Warrior, p. 33) Hugh sent his son to England to get a boarding school education. During the war, young Angleton started out in the army and was then switched over to the OSS and stationed in London to handle the Italy desk. (ibid., p. 38) He was transferred to Rome in 1944 and made chief of counter-intelligence for the entire country. By all accounts, Angleton liked Italy and stayed there until the end of 1947. When he returned to the USA, he got a high position in the newly birthed CIA. (ibid., p. 44)

    III

    One of the things that Angleton did before he left Italy is important to note for our subject at hand. He and Junio Valerio Borghese organized what was called ‘Stay-behind’ units in Italy. (Paul L. Williams, Operation Gladio, p. 15) Borghese was a Navy commander during Mussolini’s reign and fought alongside the Nazis against the Allies. By most accounts, he should have been imprisoned for war crimes. But Angleton secured his release into US Army custody. He dressed The Black Prince in an American uniform and shipped him from Milan to Rome. As Paul Williams wrote:

    Angleton needed Borghese and the 10, 267 fascists who fought under his command to help establish the stay-behind units that would ward off any Soviet aggression. (Williams, p. 28)

    Angleton got Borghese off with about three years of preventive detention. He wanted The Black Prince to “lead a shadow government, along with a secret army that could manipulate Italian affairs throughout the coming decades.” (ibid) The State Department passed an edict which gave Angleton control over the police, military intelligence and the Italian secret services.

    With this power, Borghese was now running the newly formed Gladio forces in Italy, under sectors entitled sabotage, espionage, propaganda, escape tactics and guerrilla warfare. In addition, a training camp for the stay behind units was constructed on the island of Sardinia. This camp was not just for the Italian Gladio trainees but those from Germany, France and Austria. They were sent there by former Nazi intelligence chief Reinhard Gehlen. (ibid., p. 29) As Angleton had rescued Borghese from post-war justice, Allen Dulles had saved Gehlen. The two war criminals were now in business together. They had lost the war, but—through Angleton and Dulles—they had won the peace. Very soon, there were to be hundreds of these Gladio units infiltrated into Western Europe.

    They were not just a contingent military force, but as with Borghese, a potent political one. Borghese joined the MSI (Italian Social Movement), a neo-fascist party that was largely made up of former supporters of Mussolini. But that was not reactionary enough for him. He later formed the Fronte Nazionale (National Front), which wished to abolish parties and trade unions, and was much more devoted to a quasi-military state. (Philip Willan, Puppetmasters, pp. 93-94)

    He was hardly alone in this belief. There was also Stefano Delle Chiaie, founder of National Vanguard. That group also wished to work outside the political system to subvert democracy to the point that Italy would return to fascism. And it was not just in Italy; his group carried out bombings and killings in both Spain and Chile. (Williams, p. 112)

    These rightwing groups were so powerful and well-organized that they encouraged two coups in six years. The first, in 1964, was called Piano Solo. The previous year, the communists had arranged a large labor rally and, undercover as police, Gladio members smashed it, injuring 200. (Williams, p. 74) As a result, General Giovanni DeLorenzo, assisted by 20 other senior army officers—along with CIA station chief William Harvey, military attache Vernon Walthers, plus the director of Gladio–planned an overthrow which included National Vanguard and the Mafia. Piano Solo was to conclude with the murder of Prime Minister Aldo Moro and the installation of a handpicked Christian Democrat as president. It included extensive surveillance and the rounding up of leftwing activists and their imprisonment at a concentration camp in Sardinia. (Wilian, Puppetmasters, p.35) The coup did not proceed since Moro created a compromise between the socialists and Christian Democrats, plus President Segni—who was in on the planning—sustained a cerebral hemorrhage which forced his resignation. (Williams, pp. 74-75)

    IV

    The timing of all this, the huge communist demonstration and the crackdown, can probably be attributed to President Kennedy’s breaking of Dwight Eisenhower’s Italy policy. The idea for funding the Christian Democrats was to defeat the left; so obviously, that policy did not include making the socialists or communists part of the Christian Democratic government. At the urging of Arthur Schlesinger, Kennedy was advocating for a policy of apertura, that is, an opening to the left. Schlesinger thought that by including the socialists in the government, one could split them off from the communists. Kennedy thought this was a good idea. So, in his 1963 visit to Italy, he decided to advocate the policy change. (David Talbot, The Devil’s Chessboard, pp. 464-68)

    Both Angleton and former ambassador Clare Booth Luce strongly opposed it. Luce wrote JFK an over-the-top letter, and Angleton spread rumors that Schlesinger was a Soviet agent. CIA officer William Harvey also opposed it and recommended ways to defeat it. Richard Nixon also opposed it. (Michele Metta, CMC: The Undercover CIA and Mossad Station, pp. 40-41) Kennedy ignored this. On his trip to Italy, he talked to the Socialist leader, Pietro Nenni, directly. After which Nenni clasped his wife and started weeping with joy. By the end of the year, apertura was made policy. It was this violation of tradition which likely caused the attempted coup in 1964.

    The second coup attempt was in 1970. It was led by Angleton’s favorite son, Borghese. It was supported by Delle Chiaie’s group and over 200 forest guards who arrived in coaches near Rome. Borghese thought he had support from three army regiments, the police and the Air Force. (Willan, Puppetmasters, p. 91) Also, the plotters had met with the CIA and had financing from a Swiss company in advance.

    The Black Prince was so confident of success that he had his speech already planned and, of all things, he was going to back Italy’s intervention in Vietnam! Why? Because Borghese had established contact with President Nixon and with NATO units in Malta to implement the overthrow. One of the connecting points was a man named Pier Talenti, who had worked for Nixon since 1968 and had an estate and business in Italy. Angleton arrived in the country before the coup, and he left shortly after it was aborted. (Willan, Puppetmasters, pp 117-18) In fact, NATO ships were warmed up and ready to go. What went wrong was that the planned call to Nixon was not passed on from Malta. (ibid., p. 93) Another problem was that when the coup did not go as planned, Soviet ships entered the Mediterranean. (Ibid., p. 97)

    In addition to the attempted coups, Gladio’s so-called “strategy of tension” also included a series of bombings. The first one was in December of 1969 in Milan’s Piazza Fontana. Seventeen people were killed and eighty-eight were injured. (Willan, Puppetmasters, p. 123) That same afternoon, three other bombs exploded in Rome, killing fourteen. These bombings went on until the early eighties. The most famous one was the Bologna railway station bombing of 1980, where 73 people were killed and over 200 were injured. Collectively, these were known as the Years of Lead. As time went on, they were discovered to be false flag operations. That is, they were investigated originally as leftist plots but later discovered to be done by neo-fascist groups with support from the CIA. The idea was to destabilize the country out of Kennedy’s centrist/left coalition to a centrist/right one.

    V

    After Borghese’s failed coup, he fled to Spain. He passed away there in 1974. Many years ago, I noted an entry in Clay Shaw’s address book to a Princess Marcella Borghese, who had married into the Borghese family. In my very early investigation of Shaw, this was one of the first hints that he was not the Wilson-Roosevelt-Kennedy liberal that he proclaimed himself to be. (Paris Flammonde, The Kennedy Conspiracy, p. 211) Another was the fact that he scrubbed his Who’s Who in the Southwest entry after either 1963 or 1964. Up until that time, his name appeared regularly. In those prior entries, he was listed as a member of the Board of Directors of Permindex. The exposure of Permindex would also have undermined his self-proclaimed liberal pose. Because Permindex and its offspring, Centro Mondiale Commerciale, appear to be a part of Gladio and this stay behind network in Italy. Shaw seemed interested in concealing this association.

    And for good reason. At that time, this network was so hidden and such a taboo subject that people literally lost their lives over revealing its scope and power. For example, Mino Pecorelli was an offbeat but insightful journalist in Italy in the sixties and seventies. He had some valuable sources inside “the underground state and secret services.” (Richard Cottrell, Gladio, p. 75). His stories about Gladio and its relationship to the kidnapping and eventual murder of Prime Minister Aldo Moro clearly hinted at a connection between the two. Pecorelli was even in receipt of some letters Moro wrote his family while in captivity. Mino hinted that, behind the Moro kidnapping stood a “lucid superpower”, clearly hinting at the USA. He also noted that it was interesting that the State Department sent over a Deputy Secretary to advise the Italian government not to negotiate for Moro’s release. He also indicated a connection between Gladio and the Moro death. Shortly thereafter, he was gunned down in a drive-by shooting near his office in Rome. (Ibid) Prime Minister Giulio Andreotti was implicated in his murder. He was first found guilty, then acquitted on appeal. (Richard Cottrell, Gladio, p. 78)

    Aldo Moro was a natural target of the stay-behind operations. Why? Because it was he who forged Kennedy’s left/center coalition back in 1963. (Talbot, p. 468). But what made Moro even more dangerous to the Gladio network was that, in the seventies, he was going to widen the window even more. He was going to include the communists, or PCI, in his government. In fact, in a visit to the USA, Henry Kissinger harangued him for advocating this policy, plus the fact that he leaned toward the Arabs in the Middle East dispute. It got so bad that Moro foreshortened his visit. Kissinger then slipped a story about it to the New York Times, warning that Italy could go communist. Senator Henry Jackson warned that if Moro did this, Italy would be kicked out of NATO. (Willan, Puppetmasters, p. 220-21; see also Williams, p. 103)

    After he was kidnapped and held in captivity for 55 days, some of the things he said during his so-called trial at the hands of the Red Brigades leaked out. He reportedly said that the strategy of tension was foreign-inspired but implemented with the help of the secret services. He referred to Gladio guerrilla training in case of occupation. Understandably, since he appears to have had a hand in his demise, he had nothing but venom for Andreotti–who was now acting Prime Minister–and Moro accused him of having meetings with the Agency. Moro also admitted that the Christian Democrats were funded by the CIA. (Willan, Puppetmasters, p. 291). But, and it’s a big but, his captors insist that he said even more, and these transcripts have been either lost or stolen. (ibid., p. 281, 284)

    Moro was kidnapped in a precision-type, carefully planned operation in March of 1978, with the killers in airline pilot costumes. The ambush was brilliantly executed: all five bodyguards were eliminated immediately, but Moro was kept alive in the hail of bullets. This happened on the day the debate about his new communist policy was to begin. (Williams, p. 103) In fact, it was so perfectly done that some commentators felt it was beyond the ability of the Red Brigades.

    VI

    Was there a central force behind this strategy of tension and the Moro kidnap/murder? There actually does seem to have been, not just a central force but a central character. His name was Licio Gelli, Venerable Master of the infamous Propaganda Due (P2). On the day of the Moro kidnapping, his secretary stated that Gelli was visited by two men. She overheard the following words exchanged: “The major part is over. Now we’ll see the reactions.” (Willan, Puppetmasters, p. 228) This testimony was so explosive that the Tina Anselmi P2 Commission would not hear it in open session. In fact, when it was discovered that Gelli was the head of this secret group, the government collapsed. When his villa was raided, it was revealed that P2 had well over 900 members and from almost every power center in Italy: 43 members of Parliament, 4 cabinet members, heads of branches of the secret services, chiefs of the intelligence services (SIFAR and SISMI), leaders of the Treasury, finance ministers and chairmen of banks, among many others. It even included the clergy and the military. (Willan, The Last Supper, p. 115, p. 121; Metta, CMC p. 9). It was later discovered that during the Years of Lead, both prime ministers, Andreotti and Silvio Berlusconi, were members of P2. (Williams, p 265)

    In other words, the exposure of Gelli confirmed that there was nothing fanciful about the idea that there was a shadow government overseeing the visible government. And if Gelli’s secretary was correct, that shadow government did control the political system. (Willan, The Last Supper, pp. 113-15). About his P2 lodge, Gelli told one writer, “It was an invisible army, just as Gladio was an invisible army.” (ibid., p. 117). And that was no understatement as, in addition to Moro, there was also evidence that Gelli got his intelligence services to plant ersatz leads in the Bologna bombing. (Williams, pp. 218-19)

    And there was a direct American connection. Because Gelli attended the inaugurations of Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan. (Willan, Puppetmasters, p. 67) Gelli had connections to the Allies’ intelligence network during his service in World War II, and P2 was the main Masonic lodge that kept up relations with the CIA; reportedly, the Agency funded them to the tune of millions per month. (Willan, Puppetmasters, p. 70, p. 78)

    When he was exposed through the raid, and the vast power and reach of P2 was now in the open, he went on the run. About three months later, his daughter arrived at the Rome airport. She was searched, and a false bottom was found in her briefcase. It contained a trove of documents. One of them was entitled “Stability Operations, Intelligence—Special Fields.” It outlined how Army intelligence should respond to communist insurgencies in allied nations. Part of the manual suggested that insurgency movements should be targeted and then infiltrated “with a view to establishing clandestine control by US Army intelligence over the work of such agents.” And this specifically included the leadership level. (Willan, Puppetmasters, p. 209) This discovery fit into the notion that the Red Brigades had been penetrated, and this is how Gelli knew what was happening with Moro the day he was kidnapped. The question then became: Was he also knowledgeable about Moro’s murder 55 days later, and was this why he ran? We will likely never know since well over 40 members of P2 were involved in working on the Moro case. (Metta, CMC p. 156)

    How did Gelli ascend so rapidly in the hierarchy of masonry to become one of the most powerful men in all of Italy? The Anselmi Commission on P2 discovered that Gelli was pointed out by assistant Grand Master Roberto Ascarelli to Grand Master Giordano Gamberini, in terms of his ability to do great things and enlist qualified people to the lodge. Prior to joining P2, Ascarelli knew Gelli though a lodge called Hod. (Willan, Puppetmasters, p. 59; Metta, Accomplishing Jim Garrison’s Investigation, p. 73)

    And here is the capper: Permindex/CMC met in the same place as Gelli’s P2 group; in the offices of Ascarelli in the Spanish Steps area of Rome. Later on, in a book, Gelli admitted to this location. But further, Michele Metta discovered that Ascarelli was on the Board of Directors of Permindex/CMC. (Metta, Accomplishing Jim Garrison, pp. 72-73)

    There was a crossover between the two rightwing groups. In other words, the man who sponsored Licio Gelli–the most powerful fascist in Italy– served in the same group as Clay Shaw. So much for the myth of Shaw as the Wilson-Roosevelt-Kennedy liberal.

    Click here to read part 2.

  • Three Letters to Congresswoman Luna

    Doug Horne, the military records analyst for the Assassination Records Review Board and later an author, has penned three letters to the Luna Committee.  These concern the Final Determination Notices of the ARRB, and also missing medical records that he detected in his and Jeremy Gunn’s inquiry into the autopsy evidence for the Board.

    Letter 1 – Doug Horne to Anna Luna – Subject: Final Determination Orders

    Dear Congresswoman Luna,

    This is Douglas Horne again, one of the witnesses who testified before your Task Force on May 20, 2025.

    As a former senior staff member who worked for the ARRB, I am vitally concerned about the issues related to the mishandling of the ARRB’s JFK assassination records by the National Archives from the time the ARRB shut down, in September 1998, until early this year.

    Attorney Andrew Iler, perhaps the foremost living expert on the JFK Records Act, has detailed this year, in two long articles published by Jim DiEugenio at his website Kennedys and King, the apparent malfeasance of the Archivist of the United States with regard to the handling (or rather, mishandling) of the Review Board’s FINAL DETERMINATION ORDERS regarding each assassination record we turned over to the Archives.

    Approximately 27,000 of these forms were created by the ARRB, containing disposition instructions pertaining to periodic review requirements, and also specific instructions on when each document should have been released.   It appears that in many, many cases the Archivist of the United States failed to perform the ministerial duties required of that incumbent with regard to mandatory periodic review and/or early release, prior to 2017. 

    Most of the 27,000 Final Determination Orders created by the ARRB cannot be located by NARA, or so they say.  Many documents that were ordered released in 2006 or 2007, for example, were not fully declassified and released by NARA, as the ARRB ordered.  Attorney Andrew Iler has documented these facts in his two long articles published this year.

    Whether this malfeasance was due to incompetence and an uncaring attitude, or whether it can be attributed to NARA being a tool of the intelligence community that was continuing to resist release of these records, we do not yet know.

    But the American people deserve to know why the Archivist of the United States failed to perform his ministerial duties over a period of approximately 16-17 years.

    I sincerely hope that the Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets will hold a public hearing in which the Archives, as an institution, is “taken to task” for its failures in this regard—and in which detailed explanations are provided to the Task Force about how this came about, and why.

    Andrew Iler spent years looking into this matter, and his findings have been well-documented, in writing.  He is a man of impeccable integrity.  He has communicated his findings in detail to Jake Greenberg, the Chief Counsel for Investigations for the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.  As I mentioned earlier, his two long articles about these issues have been published at the Kennedys and King blogsite.

    I am sure Andrew Iler (who is “copy to” on this email above) will readily answer any questions you may have about these issues.

    Thank you for your attention to this matter, for it is well within the scope of what your Task Force has been empowered to look into, on behalf of the American people.

    Sincerely,

    Douglas Horne

    Former Chief Analyst for Military Records, ARRB

    Letter 2 – Doug Horne to Jake Greenberg – Subject: List of Missing Medical Evidence (for Task Force Report)

    Dear Jake,

    Jefferson Morley, who apparently is very close to Chairwoman Luna, asked me yesterday for a list of missing JFK medical evidence, and asked me if I had been in touch with her staff to “follow up.”  I responded to him by providing a summary of this information, but now, one day later, I have taken the hint he dropped on me, and have decided to provide such a list to you directlyunfiltered by anyone else.

    Since I am currently the pre-eminent living expert on JFK’s autopsy (no false modesty here), I thought you should receive such a list directly from me, without having any third party possibly filter it, misunderstand the facts here, or water it down.

    So here is my definitive list of missing JFK medical evidence:

    1.  Eight sets of autopsy photographs are known to be missing, based on credible eyewitness testimony and recollections, and were never placed into the official record; most “sets” of autopsy photos known today consist of two black and white negatives, and two-to-four color positive transparencies, 4 x 5 inches in size, of the same view.  Autopsy photographs that I am confident are missing include:

    a. an overhead, wide-shot of JFK’s body taken from a stepladder;
    b. large bruise atop the right lung, taken inside the interior of the chest, after the lungs were removed;
    c. entrance wound in the lower right of the skull, with scalp reflected, taken from the outside of the skull;
    d. entrance wound in the lower right of the skull, taken from inside the
    cranium, after the brain was removed;
    e. condition of the back of the head, after embalming and reconstruction was completed, still showing an exit defect that could not be closed; [witness Saundra Spencer recalled in sworn testimony to the ARRB that this, and similar images, were recorded on color negatives, not color positive transparencies and B&W negatives, as were the remainder of the autopsy photos in the National Archives]
    f. negatives from a B&W film pack showing metal probes in JFK’s body; [these images were developed and seen by White House photographer Robert Knudsen, but were never placed in the National Archives]
    g. B&W prints showing a large exit defect in the rear of JFK’s head; [shown to USIA White House photographer by White House photographer and Navy Chief, Robert Knudsen]
    h. B&W prints (and at least one color positive transparency) showing a small entry wound high in the forehead above the corner of JFK’s right eye. [there are five credible witnesses who have seen such images]

    2.  Two JFK skull x-rays known to have been taken—both oblique views of the exit wound in the right rear of his head—have never been placed into the official record.  [witness: Jerrol Custer, Navy x-ray technician, to the ARRB]

    3.  Furthermore, since all three extant JFK skull x-rays in the National Archives are known to be copy films, and are not originals, the three originals of those x-rays are missing as well.  [specifically, one left lateral skull film, one right lateral skull film, and one A-P, or “anterior-posterior” skull film] 

    4.  The “Harper Fragment” of cranial bone from the occipital region of JFK’s skull, found in Dealey Plaza on November 23, 1963, has been missing since December of 1963.  It was last signed for by the President’s Military Physician, Rear Admiral George Burkley.  Its dimensions were approximately 2.75 inches in width and 2.5 inches high.  Photographs exist in the public record: it was photographed by the 3 pathologists who examined it at Methodist Hospital in Dallas, and also by the FBI, after it was sent to Washington. D.C.

    5.  Missing bullet fragments retrieved from JFK’s body at Bethesda Naval Hospital prior to the commencement of the “autopsy of record” at approximately 8:15 PM on November 22, 1963 include: 

    a. one vial containing about the ten tiny fragments removed from JFK’s brain; [witness: mortician Tom Robinson of Gawler’s Funeral Home, to both the HSCA and the ARRB]

    b. one bullet fragment removed from JFK’s back (from the intercostal tissue, between his ribs); [witnesses: Tom Robinson of Gawler’s to the HSCA; Navy corpsman Paul O’Connor to the HSCA; and Navy x-ray technician Jerrol Custer to the ARRB] 

    c. and finally, the four “large” bullet fragments for which Navy corpsman Dennis David typed a receipt (for a Federal Agent) the night of the autopsy.  [Witness: Navy corpsman Dennis David to the ARRB; he not only typed the receipt, but he also saw the fragments, and was also allowed by the Federal Agent to handle the fragments] 

    All of those fragments, seen by credible witnesses, remain missing today, and were never introduced into the official record.

    END OF LIST

    Jake, I would greatly appreciate it if you would acknowledge receipt of this important summary of missing JFK medical evidence, and if you would also forward it to Chairwoman LUNA and her staff. 

    I am assuming that you may find such a list useful when the Task Force Report is written.

    Sincerely,

    Douglas P. Horne

    Former Chief Analyst for Military Records, ARRB

    Letter 3 – Doug Horne to Anna Luna – Subject: List of Missing Medical Evidence (for Task Force Report)

    Dear Congresswoman Luna,

    I am Douglas Horne, the ARRB medical evidence witness who testified before your Task Force on May 20, 2025.

    I wanted to take this opportunity to forward, directly to you, a comprehensive list of missing JFK autopsy medical evidence which we definitely know today once existed, but which is now missing.

    I sent this list to Jake Greenberg some time ago (back on July 18th), in the hopes that it would find its way into the report your task Force will issue on the JFK records issues, but I never received an acknowledgment from him.

    Therefore, I am forwarding it directly to you and your chief of staff, in the hopes that it will be useful to you in writing your report (and in explaining why we should have no confidence in the Warren Report’s conclusions about a lone assassin).

    If a lone nut had killed the president in 1963, and it was a “simple murder” as some have claimed, there would have been no need to destroy and/or alter so any medical records related to the autopsy, or to dispose of bullet fragments from JFK’s body and a crucial bone fragment from his skull.

    I know from the news stories I am aware of that you are very busy this year, but I hope that you will find this list of missing medical evidence useful when writing the Task Force Report.

    Sincerely,

    Douglas Horne

    Former Chief Analyst for Military Records, ARRB

  • New RFK Film – Rob Wilson, Sean Stone, and Oliver Stone – “Legacy”

    A new film on the RFK case is now available. It was made by Rob Wilson, Sean Stone and Oliver Stone, and is titled Legacy. Three of the main interview subjects are Lisa Pease, Dick Russell and Robert Kennedy, Jr.

    Please see a review of the film here.

  • Russ Tarby on Thomas Mallon’s book, “Mrs. Paine’s Garage”

    Russ Tarby concludes that Thomas Mallon’s foray into “non-fiction” — a book about Ruth and Michael Paine — is both a disappointment and perhaps even a disgrace.

    Russ Tarby on Thomas Mallon’s book: Mrs. Paine’s Garage

    The book, Mrs. Paine’s Garage, fails not so much for what it is but for what it is not.

    Mallon’s subjects, Ruth and her ex-husband, Michael Paine, were the young couple who befriended Lee and Marina Oswald in early 1963. When President John F. Kennedy’s long-awaited visit to Dallas rolled around on Nov. 22, 1963, Marina was living at Ruth’s house in Irving, Texas. Lee Oswald, who would eventually be charged with the president’s gunshot slaying, spent the night before the assassination there at Ruth’s home. When Dallas police appeared at the Irving address on that fateful Friday afternoon, Marina told them Lee’s rifle was missing from the garage.

    Mallon’s book could have delved deeply into the Paines’ background, revealing their family’s relationship, for instance, to former CIA Director Allen Dulles, who was one of the seven Warren Commissioners appointed by Lyndon Johnson to inquire into the Kennedy assassination. This was odd on its face because President Kennedy had fired Dulles—along with Deputy Director Charles Cabell, and Director of Plans Richard Bissell—over the disastrous Bay of Pigs operation of April 1961. Kennedy suspected, correctly, that they knew it was going to fail and were relying on him to send in the Navy and Marines to bail out the project. Which was something he had pledged in public previously that he was not going to do. Could someone like Dulles, who had deceived Kennedy and then been terminated from his dream job, could someone like that be trusted to look for the facts about his assassination?

    To protect a Pandora’s Box of CIA secrets — including its plans to murder Cuban dictator Fidel Castro, which was also kept from the president — Dulles worked hard to conceal and obfuscate aspects of the JFK assassination probe rather than to reveal what really happened. No one attended more meetings or asked more questions than Allen Dulles. And no one answered more questions than the Paines. Ruth herself replied to over 5,000 questions over six days. Compare that to how many questions were posed by attorney Arlen Specter and replied to by one of the autopsy doctors, Thornton Boswell. Boswell was asked 14 questions, and his testimony consumes less than one full page of the Warren Commission hearings. This is about one of the most controversial and incomplete pieces of pathology in medical history.

    When the Paines each testified before the Warren Commission in 1964, Dulles oversaw their questioning. For many years, Michael’s New England-based mother and stepfather, Ruth and Arthur Young, had been close friends of Mary Bancroft. Bancroft was run as an OSS agent during World War II by Dulles. She was also his mistress dating back to the time as an officer in Switzerland during the war.

    If the public had known in 1964 about Dulles’ treachery and deceit, and the true reasons for his termination, would they have tolerated him on the Commission? Because it was not just over the Bay of Pigs that JFK could not live with Dulles. It was also over the CIA’s role in the murder of African leader Patrice Lumumba. Lumumba died about 72 hours before Kennedy was inaugurated. Kennedy’s predecessor, Dwight Eisenhower, had ordered Dulles to kill Lumumba. Kennedy supported Lumumba as an African nationalist. Therefore, some believe his murder was timed to take place before JFK took office.

    Kennedy also was upset over the Dulles opposition to France’s President Charles DeGaulle. Since 1957, when he gave a speech on Algeria in the Senate, John Kennedy had supported Algeria’s struggle to be free from French colonialism. DeGaulle was predisposed to that path. But a group of military and civilian French officials opposed Algerian independence. They were actively trying to kill DeGaulle and even tried to overthrow his government. The top level of the CIA agreed with them and offered them aid and encouragement. Kennedy told the French ambassador in the USA that he had no role in this. But he could not assure him about the CIA, because often he did not know what they were doing. So for these reasons, Kennedy decided Dulles had to go.

    If all this had been out in the open, and if the idea of making the Paines the star witnesses against Oswald, along with their family ties to Dulles, the Warren Commission may have had a much rockier ride with the press and public. And this does not even include the role of FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover. President Lyndon Johnson and Hoover both desperately wanted the JFK hit to dissolve swiftly into history, attributed to a “lone nut,” Oswald, who in turn was assassinated by another “lone nut,” Dallas nightclub operator Jack Ruby.

    Thomas Mallon is apparently among the shrinking number of Americans who swallow that unlikely scenario, the double-lone nut theory.

    Instead of exploring the Paines’ ties to Dulles in this book—a matter which Dulles himself joked about in private–Mallon wallows in Ruth’s Quakerism and her worries over her lost friendship with Marina. Yet, under oath before a New Orleans grand jury, Marina stated that the Secret Service had dissolved that relationship. Why? Because they felt that Ruth had “friends over there,” meaning the Agency, and they did not want it to appear that Marina was involved in all that.

    Instead of examining Michael’s classified work at Bell Helicopter or his father’s interest in the assassination of Leon Trotsky, he describes the husband’s fascination with cabinetry and contradancing. By doing these things, Mallon effectively trivializes the JFK murder and expressly taunts those who insist that the Paines deserve more serious probing. Mallon actually mocks longtime assassination researchers by comparing them to “Trekkies,” the cult-like followers of a long-ago canceled TV science fiction show.

    Yet those who have actually explored these cracks and crevices in the story of the Paines include independent researchers like Carol Hewett, Steve Jones and Barbara LaMonica. Those three explored the hidden record and came up with a series of in-depth and fascinating articles which ran in Probe Magazine over a number of years. Hewett, for one, is a graduate of the University of Texas Law School and has been a practicing attorney in Florida for decades.  Having endeared himself to Ruth–courting her carefully over three years via mail and telephone in order to secure her permission to interview her at length about the murder of the president–Mallon somehow was free to evade all of the implications of their discoveries.

    The Westport, Connecticut writer boasts a lengthy and impressive resume, having cranked out well-received novels such as Henry and Clara and Dewey Defeats Truman, as well as a collection of essays, In Fact. But yet, here he seems to rely on his literary talents to dance around issues he should have more fully embraced. Specifically, he simply labels such facts as the Dulles connection as mere “coincidence.”

    In making this point, Mallon quotes two people: Ruth’s mother, who blames “fate” for her daughter’s unusual notoriety, and Norman Mailer, author of Oswald’s Tale, a 1995 biography of the alleged assassin.

    Mallon neglects to inform his readers that in Mailer’s book, he actually suggested the possibility of a second assassin. He asserted that — given the unlikelihood of the Warren Report’s single-bullet theory — a second gunman may well have stood, completely by chance, firing at JFK from behind the stockade fence on the grassy knoll in front of the presidential limousine while Oswald fired from behind–totally oblivious to the other shooter! After reading such illogical deductions, you can see why writers such as Mailer and Mallon remain more highly admired for their fiction than for their non-fiction.

    To illustrate his insistence that coincidence ruled the Paines’ fate, Mallon concludes his book by relating a story about Mr. and Mrs. Raymond Entenmann, former Paine pals who happened to help stock JFK’s Fort Worth Hotel room with artwork on the night of Nov. 21-22, 1963.

    The Entenmanns have nothing to do with the killing of the president, of course. But Mallon seems to be saying that since the Paines knew the Entenmanns, it’s also logical that they may have known Dulles or Dallas FBI agent James Hosty. And that we shouldn’t be surprised that Ruth’s father worked for a CIA-related development agency in South America, or that Michael happened to have a Minox camera, which the FBI used to disguise the fact that Oswald had one, which the Bureau then disappeared.

    Inexplicably, although they both gave lengthy testimony before the Warren Commission in 1964, neither of the Paines were called before the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) from 1976-79. And neither were they called before the Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB) from 1994 to 98. And Thomas Mallon apparently agrees with all this since he does not ask them any difficult questions in his book.

    Is it just a coincidence that Ruth Paine was involved in finding Lee Oswald a job about five weeks before the JFK murder? And that site just happened to be on the revised pathway for Kennedy’s motorcade. Which, according to Commission testimony, Oswald was unaware of until that morning?

    Is it just a coincidence that the Paine household became a treasure trove of evidence against Oswald? Evidence that somehow the Dallas Police failed to find in their searches of the house? And it was not just one search, it was two over two days.

    Was it just a coincidence that the man who first escorted the Oswalds around Dallas upon their return from Russia was George DeMohrenschildt, a White Russian who did work for the CIA? And that he then introduced them to Ruth Paine in February of 1963, before he left for Haiti on an Agency-related assignment. Or that, after Ruth Paine and Marina’s relationship dissipated, that writer Priscilla Johnson entered the picture to become Marina’s new escort? And that ARRB declassified documents reveal her to be a “witting collaborator” for the Agency?

    Is it just a coincidence that Michael Paine’s family ties extend back to the wealthy first families of the USA, namely the Cabots and the Forbeses? Or that some of these relations were involved in the CIA/ United Fruit overthrow of the Arbenz regime in Guatemala in 1954?

    Is it just a coincidence that Ruth’s father, William Avery Hyde, worked for a CIA-front organization called the Agency for International Development in Latin America, both before and after the JFK hit?

    Is it just a coincidence that Michael’s stepfather was Arthur Young, who invented certain improvements to the Bell Helicopter, which made him a rich man and also helped Michael get a job at the Bell facility near Dallas, where he was working on the day of Kennedy’s murder? That Michael had a security clearance to work there, and yet he had two persons who just returned from Russia staying at his house? One being a self-proclaimed Marxist who had been arrested in New Orleans?

    Is it just a coincidence that Ruth took an automobile trip to the Northeast during the summer of 1963 after she had befriended the Oswalds? And that during that timely journey, she told friends and family in advance that she was going to pick up a Russian lady eventually on her return. Which she did, and Ruth placed her in her home, thus separating Marina from her husband at the time of the JFK murder.

    On the macroscopic level:

    Can it just be a coincidence that Jack Ruby’s idol was Lewis McWillie, who ran one of Santo Trafficante’s casinos in Havana, and that Trafficante was one of the Mafia dons whom the CIA hired to assassinate Castro?

    Is it just a coincidence that J. Edgar Hoover despised Attorney General Bobby Kennedy, and that when JFK was killed, he ripped out RFK’s private line into his office? That while doing all he could to conceal the true circumstances of the president’s death, like covering up the bullet strike to the curb that hit bystander James Tague?

    Is it just a coincidence that the Commission covered up the fact that three Commissioners—Sen. Richard Russell, Sen. John Sherman Cooper, and Congressman Hale Boggs did not want to sign the Warren Report since they had reservations about the Magic Bullet theory. And that when Russell called up President Johnson after the final meeting, Johnson said he did not believe it either?

    Would any objective person consider all the above, and much more, to be simply a coincidence. Probably not, which is why Lee Oswald never stood trial and why the Commission—made up almost entirely of lawyers– never gave him a defense counsel.

    (The above is a revised and expanded version of the original review, which appeared in The Citizen of Cayuga County, NY, where Russ was a copy editor and staff writer.)

    For more on the Paines, see Jim DiEugenio’s substack, which is still free.

    https://jamesanthonydieugenio.substack.com/p/the-passing-of-ruth-paine-pt-1

    https://jamesanthonydieugenio.substack.com/p/the-passing-of-ruth-paine-pt-2

     
  • Oliver Stone Does Not Give Up: He Wants Those Files!

    Based on the work of researcher, author and Canadian lawyer Andrew Iler, Oliver Stone tells Acting Archivist Marco Rubio that there must be oversight on compliance with the JFK Records Act to ensure that all records are released in accordance with the law.

     

    Oliver Stone’s letter to Marco Rubio follows:

    Oliver Stone
    Ixtlan Productions
    Los Angeles, CA 90064

    Dear Secretary of State Rubio:

    I am writing you as the Acting Archivist at NARA. As you may recall, in 1991 I co-wrote and directed JFK. That film caused the passage of the JFK Records Collection Act, and the creation of the Assassination Records Review Board (ARRB). This legislation certified that all the records about President Kennedy’s assassination should be released by 10/26/17.

    I have testified about this twice before congress: once in 1992 and again in April of this year. I had to appear this second time because the JFK Records Act has been disobeyed. Almost eight years after the terminal date, and seven months after President Trump’s executive order, all of the JFK records have not been declassified. It is disturbing to see the intelligence agencies defying both congress and the president.

    I have since learned about four issues you and the president should be informed of, since they negatively impact this reluctance to obey the will of congress. The ARRB issued over 27,000 binding and enforceable declassification orders called Final Determinations. By law, these should have been the last word on JFK Records. Not so. In fact, for all intents and purposes, they have not even been made public or searchable by NARA–even though they have been subject to repeated FOIA requests. It is not clear that either you, or Presidents Trump or Biden were aware of these strictures. Legally, they should have impacted any and all decisions on the remaining JFK closed records.

    We now know that President Clinton signed onto a Memo of Understanding with the ARRB. And he did not override any of their Final Determinations. These are crucial precedents concerning the efficacy of those decisions. Yet, it troubles me that these binding orders have been ignored and buried for over 25 years. It is my information that only 2 percent of the tens of thousands have been released to the public; and that neither congress nor the White House appear to be cognizant of this crucial fact.

    Secondly, there is evidence that the CIA tried to subvert the JFK Records Collection Act by submitting a large amount of material to NARA before the Board was appointed and started working. This is contained in a 1992 secret Agency memo to the Archives. This information is complemented by ARRB chair John Tunheim’s testimony before the Luna Committee Task Force on declassification in May. There he stated that “many of the recently released records were never shown to the ARRB.” If records were transferred before or after the four-year term of the Board, then they likely escaped proper review.

    Third, according to all interested visitors to NARA, the state of the JFK Records Collection is simply and frankly a mess. There is no comprehensive, usable index or catalog. Even though the JFK Act specifies their function to maintain one for each record.

    Fourth, at the closing of my film, I displayed a card which stated that the records of the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA)—the last formal inquiry into Kennedy’s murder– were largely classified, 13 years after the committee shut down. Yet, to this day, some of those HSCA files are still partly closed. That secrecy also applied to another congressional body of work, the Church Committee, which preceded the HSCA. This, in spite of the fact that the JFK Act declares presidential postponement should only apply to executive branch records.

    These conditions have been allowed to fester because there has been no proper supervision of the Board decisions since 1998. There should have been: by either congress or the archivist or both. Therefore I would hope that you would make a formal request to the full House Oversight Committee to fulfill the mandate of the JFK Records Act, which ordered full and complete release by October of 2017. There should be an explanation as to why these records are still closed and why the Final Determinations are not fully open to the public 62 years after President Kennedy’s death. Both representatives Anna Luna and Eric Burlison have called for accountability by the CIA in the wake of their release of George Joannides records. In my view we should not be limited to just that. The CIA and FBI should finally be called upon to release every last document in full.

    I would be glad to inform you and/or the president more fully on these matters if you so desire.

    Yours Sincerely,

  • Matt Crumpton and Jeff Crudele Discuss Estes/Carter Tape Authenticity

    Matt Crumpton and Jeff Crudele critically discuss the alleged Billy Sol Estes / Cliff Carter tape concerning the JFK assassination, played by Alex Jones and produced by Shane Stevens, the grandson of Estes.

    The clip, which may be found here, is an excerpt from Matt Crumpton’s podcast’s 16th edition of Recap and Rebuttals.

    A complete discussion from the second part of this rebuttal episode, titled “JFK Assassination Podcasters Debate the Credibility of Mac Wallace and the Murchison Party”, featuring Jeff Crudele, may be found here.

    Matt Crumpton’s entire JFK podcast series may be found here.

    Jeff Crudele’s YouTube channel (“JFK The Enduring Secret”) may be found here. His website, which he admits is out of date, but will be refreshed shortly, may be found here.

    A Kennedys and King addendum, supporting the position that Mac Wallace was not directly involved in Dallas on 11/22/63, follows:

    In her book, Faustian Bargains,  Joan Mellen showed that Wallace was not in Texas the day of the assassination.  So how could he have been in on the assassination?

    Secondly, the late Jay Harrison produced what he thought was a Wallace fingerprint from a box on the Sixth Floor.  He said it was Wallace’s.   But he used two analysts, and both of their fingerprint certifications had expired. It turned out that one of the best fingerprint analysts in America, Robert Garrett, who ran the certification program, did an examination for Joan. And he used better originating materials and better technical tools. To him, there was no question that it was not Wallace’s fingerprint.

    Prior to Joan’s book, that had been the best evidence that Wallace had been a hit man.  And Barr McClellan used it in his book Blood, Money and Power.

  • Ruth Paine’s Passing

    Ruth Paine, the woman who Marina Oswald was staying with at the time of the JFK murder, has passed away. We have a link to an obituary, but we recommend the reader watch Max Good’s “The Assassiantion and Mrs. Paine” for a more balanced view (free link here).